- Weirdo Guy (talk) 02:25, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
- ♪ You don't have to be afraid to put your dreams in action, You'll never gonna fade you'll be the main attraction ♪" ~Make it Shine 02:30, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
- I'm good with that as long as teachers have the option of roleplaying in a way that isn't exactly conforming to the expected standards, and then of course having problems with the ministry because of it. Bond_em7 (Owl Me) 14:27, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed with Bond. Head of Ravenclaw | Send me an Owl! 00:49, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Dduffurg48 07:41, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
- As long as we still have the ability to teach it our own way and still meet these outcomes, Im in. --~Peislandgal 11:54, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Bryans and HoR's comments have made me rethink this. It's more realistic. However, I still don't have a problem with the current system. I'm voting neutral on this one, though it looks like it'll be passed anyway. Echostar 12:08, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
I'm not saying that the current system is flawed. But, with the addition of the teachers from Hogwarts, I think have a minimal standard (not eliminating the teachers freedom to use their own style) and have a more unified teaching experience would benefit us all.
What I agree in this system is a standarized test, which I originally planned on implementing when I created the system. However, time restrictions led us to the current way of every teacher making their own. This way, the tests and stuff can be unified, but we can have our own styles still.